|
6. Misconception about marketing
There are various misconceptions about marketing in the educational
world:
Marketing is merely about promoting
Very often schools see marketing as designing a new school prospectus or
a new sign.
These promotional activities are, in fact, only part of the
process of marketing. What is more important is that schools
realize that the staff, and all those involved whit the
school, should understand the nature and scope of marketing
as a concept. One of the central concerns of marketing is
quality. The marketing of schools involves finding out what
the clients want and need and then designing a product and
service that provides a quality education to meet those
wants and needs. The concept of marketing is rooted in an
organizational orientation, which focuses on client wants
and needs and on their satisfaction. It is concerned with
the benefits derived by the client rather than the features
provided by the supplier. In essence, marketing can be seen
as the key element in the accountability and responsibility
relationship, which the school has with its clients. The
school should, therefore, communicate effectively the fact
it is providing the service, which meets the wants and needs
of its clients. Schools should see marketing as being the
way that they think about and respond to the clients and not
as being a single event such as producing a prospectus. The
distinction has to be drawn between these single events and
overall marketing process. Marketing is thus best thought of
as a process and not an event.
Marketing is only to people outside the school
It is important to realize that there are both internal and external
markets and it is the internal one, which needs to be given
attention initially. If those inside the school do not have
a clear sense of its purpose, identity and values then it
will be difficult to convince the external world of these
characteristics. If individuals from the external community
meet teachers, pupils and governors and perceive that they
have no clear idea of what the school stands for or of its
successes and achievements, then it will cast doubt on the
reliability of any promotional or publicity information
which they have received. In order to communicate an
effective message, the pupils, staff and governors must have
a corporate perspective. For this reason, the initial
marketing activity must concentrate on those, working inside
the school. They need to develop a coherent view of the
school, agreeing and supporting the school in the long run.
There is little point in looking at external marketing and
promotion strategies unless a coherent internal educational
structure and commitment exist. In fact, many schools do
exactly the opposite by concentrating on external market
first.
Marketing is not our job
One of the most difficult things to change in an organization is a
individuals’ attitude. It is especially difficult to change
the way in which people think about marketing because of its
historical development in the commercial world. Everyone
inside the school, such as teachers, caretakers and
secretaries, should act as ambassadors for the school and
should fulfill this role when they respond to individuals or
to organizations. The problem is that, too often, marketing
is seen to be the sole responsibility of senior management.
Traditionally, teachers have seen their job as getting on
which teaching and, similarly, office staff and other
support staff focus on the task in hand. However, the
clients, when they asses a school, often make judgments
based on the representatives whom they meet when contacting
the school for the first time. This may be the school
secretary who answers the telephone or the teacher whom they
meet after school. It is important for all staff to see that
they have a role in presenting a positive view of the school
and that they should seek opportunities to do so. This
traditional attitude has to be replaced by one where
everyone accepts that it is their task to represent and
market the school.
The wants and needs of the clients are the same.
There is a problem to be faced concerning the balance between the
educational needs of children and the wants articulated by
them or they parents. If schools are to relate their
services to the wants as perceived by the clients, then a
dilemma may present itself because the wants as perceived by
the clients may not match the pupil's needs as perceived by
the professional educators. schools were to take the view
that the customer is always right and to try to meet
the very diverse wants of individuals, then the result would
probably to a chaotic and unsatisfactory educational
experience for the pupils. There are, for example, very
differing views of the schools role in sex education. The
real art in effective management is to lead clients towards
a situation where their expectation coincides with those of
the school. On this basis, therefore, a school must provide
an education in which content and quality both meets the
needs of pupils as identified by professional educators and
society and, as far as possible, satisfies the wants as
identified by the pupils and their parents. This can only
happen when the clients are sure that the professionals
understand their preferences and perceptions about the
nature of the educational product or service.
It is this view of meeting needs and wants in an accountability
relationship and the effective communication of the schools
values, activities and achievements which are central to the
concept of marketing. Such organizational understanding
needs to precede the detailed management of the process of
marketing.
Either the pupil or the parent is the immediate client
Having established the difference between wants and needs it is important
to examine whose wants and needs are being considered. Is it
the pupil or the parent who is the immediate client? In the
primary school most staff would see the pupils as the
clients and, therefore, the first priority of the teacher.
On the other hand, secondary school teachers often consider
that parents are the clients and that they are accountable
to them. This view can be considered further by assessing
pupil becomes the client as he/she grows up. It is true that
the younger the child, the more dominant is the parent is
making the choice of school. While it is important to
maintain an awareness of both pupil and parent wants,
attention should also be focused on the deliberate
transmission of positive images to the clients- a
significant aspect of managing a schools reputation and one
which involves all the staff every day. Viewing both the
parent and the pupil as the immediate client is not fudging
the issue but is maintaining the fine balance, which schools
must achieve, in building effective relationships with their
clients. |